Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SU, CR-11-00288 JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141106990 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PRONOUNCEMENT OF SENTENCE AS TO RESTITUTION JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. For the reasons set forth below, the parties jointly request the Court to amend the restitution order component of the final judgment for Total Merchant Services in the above-entitled case from $309,087.84 to $420,684.64. On October 31, 2014, this Court conducted a sentencing hearing in the above-entitled case, which included an order for the Defendant Susan Xiao-Pin
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PRONOUNCEMENT OF SENTENCE AS TO RESTITUTION

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth below, the parties jointly request the Court to amend the restitution order component of the final judgment for Total Merchant Services in the above-entitled case from $309,087.84 to $420,684.64.

On October 31, 2014, this Court conducted a sentencing hearing in the above-entitled case, which included an order for the Defendant Susan Xiao-Ping Su to pay restitution to Total Merchant Services. The Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSR) identified $309,087.84 as the restitution amount owed to Total Merchant Services and directed payments to be sent to Total Merchant Services, Inc., Attn: Director of Operations, Director of Operations, 255 Gold River Road, 3d Floor, Basalt, CO 81621. Before final pronouncement of sentence, the United States noted that the PSR's restitution amount pertaining to Total Merchant Services was not current, and that the accurate amount was $420,684.64, as set forth in the United States' sentencing memorandum. The United States explained that it had provided the revised restitution calculation to the United States Probation Office, but not to counsel for the defense.

Accordingly, following the sentencing hearing, the United States provided updated loss information to counsel for the defendant regarding the underlying restitution calculation for Total Merchant Services and the parties jointly agree that the judgment should reflect an order of restitution to Total Merchant Services in the amount of $420,684.64 and that payments should be sent to: Jonathan E. Orell, Esq., C/O Total Merchant Services Restitution Payment, Berkowitz, Trager & Trager, LLC, 8 Wright Street, Westport, CT 06880. The parties further stipulate that nothing in this agreement will constitute a waiver of the defendant's right to appeal any component of the sentence.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint request to amend the restitution order in the above-entitled case as to Total Merchant Services from $309,087.84 to $420,684.64 and to have restitution payments sent to Jonathan E. Orell, Esq., C/O Total Merchant Services Restitution Payment, Berkowitz, Trager & Trager, LLC, 8 Wright Street, Westport, CT 06880.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer