Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 97-8483 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 97-8483 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 18, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Robert E. McANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to Lockheed-Aeronautical Systems Company, a division of Lockheed Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, J. A. Blackwell, Jr., T. A. Graham, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-8483. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 11, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:96-CV-1584-JOF); J. Owen Forrester, Jud
More
                     Robert E. McANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

                                                      v.

  LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to Lockheed-Aeronautical Systems
Company, a division of Lockheed Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee,

                     J. A. Blackwell, Jr., T. A. Graham, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

                                                No. 97-8483.

                                      United States Court of Appeals,

                                              Eleventh Circuit.

                                               Aug. 11, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:96-CV-1584-JOF);
J. Owen Forrester, Judge.

(Opinion June 18, 1999, 
177 F.3d 1310
, 11th Cir., 1999).

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK,
CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.

        BY THE COURT:

        A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing

en banc,

        IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.




  *
   Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 46(c).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer