Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TRUJILLO v. KMART CORPORATION, 1-16-CV-00297-AWI-SKO. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160419748 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KMART CORPORATION AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ANTHONY W. ISHII , District Judge . Good cause appearing therefore, and pursuant to the Parties stipulation, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Defendant KMART CORPORATION shall have up to and including April 26, 2016, to file its responsive pleading. This extension does not impact or change any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KMART CORPORATION AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Good cause appearing therefore, and pursuant to the Parties stipulation, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Defendant KMART CORPORATION shall have up to and including April 26, 2016, to file its responsive pleading. This extension does not impact or change any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer