GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS on May 28, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application For Order Shortening Time To Hear Their Motion To Compel the taking of depositions of Defendant's employees as follows:
Plaintiffs also sought to compel the taking of depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins in Modesto, California;
WHEREAS the Honorable Gary S. Austin granted an Order Shortening Time to hear Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel on June 5, 2015 and scheduled an informal telephonic conference with counsel for the Parties on June 4, 2015;
WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, the Honorable Gary S. Austin convened an informal telephonic conference with Plaintiffs' counsel, Kirin K. Virk and Brandy L. Barnes, and Defendant's counsel, Edward Murphy, and ordered the Parties to inform the Court by 3:00 p.m. as to whether they were able to informally resolve the scheduling of Defendant's employees depositions and the locations for the depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins;
WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, the Parties agreed to the following schedule for the taking of depositions of Defendant's employees:
A. The following depositions to be conducted at 9:00 a.m. at the Modesto office of Damrell, Nelson, Schrimp, Pallios, Pacher & Silva:
B. The Parties agreed that the depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins would be taken during the week of July 20
1. The Parties have subsequently clarified and agreed that the deposition of Mr. Robinson will be taken by Plaintiffs' counsel in Hartford, Connecticut and/or or by video conference on Tuesday, July 21st at 9:00 a.m. and
2. The deposition of Ms. Collins will be taken by Plaintiffs' counsel in Atlanta, Georgia and/or by video conference on Thursday, July 23
WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, Plaintiffs informed the Court that the Parties had agreed upon a deposition schedule and Plaintiffs' Motion To Compel was taken off calendar.
WE HEREBY AGREE AND CONSENT to the terms of the above Stipulation.
The Court has reviewed and adopts the above Stipulation regarding the taking of Defendant's employees' depositions. The above schedule may only be modified by mutual agreement of counsel and/or by Court order. The terms of the Stipulation resolve the disputes between the parties raised in the Motion to Compel (ECF No. 35). Thus, the Motion to Compel is DENIED as moot.