BARKER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 2:14-cv-2403 CKD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150127939
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC). (ECF No. 4.) Having reviewed the FAC, the undersigned concludes that it states cognizable claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action. In accordance with the abo
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC). (ECF No. 4.) Having reviewed the FAC, the undersigned concludes that it states cognizable claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action. In accordance with the abov..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC). (ECF No. 4.) Having reviewed the FAC, the undersigned concludes that it states cognizable claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service is appropriate for the following defendants: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Brian Duffy, K. Allen, W. Perehoduk, and K. Anger.
Source: Leagle
