Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Walker River Irrigation District, 3:73-cv-00127-MMD-WGC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190301e87 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL IN EQUITY NO. C-125-RCJ SUBPROCEEDING NO. C-125-B WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . GEORGE M. KEELE, the current attorney of record for Defendant, THE KEN AND DOROTHY GARDNER TRUST, does hereby stipulate and agree to the substitution of RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. of KAEMPFER CROWELL, in his place and stead, in the above-entitled matter. The substitution will not result in the delay of any hearing in this case. RICHARD G. CAMPBELL
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

IN EQUITY NO. C-125-RCJ

SUBPROCEEDING NO. C-125-B

GEORGE M. KEELE, the current attorney of record for Defendant, THE KEN AND DOROTHY GARDNER TRUST, does hereby stipulate and agree to the substitution of RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. of KAEMPFER CROWELL, in his place and stead, in the above-entitled matter. The substitution will not result in the delay of any hearing in this case.

RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. of KAEMPFER CROWELL does hereby agree to be substituted in the place and stead of GEORGE M. KEELE as attorney of record for THE KEN AND DOROTHY GARDNER TRUST in the above-entitled matter. RICHARD G. CAMPBELL) JR. states that he is duly admitted to practice before this Court and accepts responsibility for all dates set for pretrial proceedings, trial, or hearings, by the discovery plan or any court order.

THE KEN AND DOROTHY GARDNER TRUST hereby consents to the substitution of RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. of KAEMPFER CROWELL in the place and stead of GEORGE M. KEELE as its attorney of record in the above-entitled matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to the October 17, 2014 Superseding Order Regarding Service [Document No. 2100, p. 10, ¶ 20], this Stipulation [and Proposed Order] Permitting Substitution of Counsel does not affect the rights of others and does not raise significant issues of law or fact and, as such, is not subject to the postcard notice provided in Paragraph 17.c thereof. Accordingly, the foregoing Stipulation [and Proposed Order] Permitting Substitution of Counsel will not be served on the Unrepresented Parties who have opted for postcard service.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer