BLITZ v. AgFEED INDUSTRIES, INC., 3-11-0992 (Lead case). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140926f41
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 222), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP (Docket No. 186) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP are DISMI
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 222), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP (Docket No. 186) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP are DISMIS..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 222), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP (Docket No. 186) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP are DISMISSED.
The remaining claims are the subject of a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, which will be heard in this Court on October 2, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
