Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

D'Lil v. Riverboat Delta King, Inc., 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-AC. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150708977 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND COSTS WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . TO THE COURT: On July 20, 2015, Plaintiff Hollynn D'Lil ("Plaintiff") filed a motion seeking an award of attorney's fees, litigation expenses and costs ("Fee Motion"). Defendant Riverboat Delta King's ("Delta King") opposition to Plaintiff's Fee Motion is due on July 13, 2015. Plaintiff's reply to Delta King's op
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND COSTS

TO THE COURT:

On July 20, 2015, Plaintiff Hollynn D'Lil ("Plaintiff") filed a motion seeking an award of attorney's fees, litigation expenses and costs ("Fee Motion"). Defendant Riverboat Delta King's ("Delta King") opposition to Plaintiff's Fee Motion is due on July 13, 2015. Plaintiff's reply to Delta King's opposition is due on July 20, 2015, and this matter is set to be heard by the Court on July 27, 2015.

Plaintiff's Fee Motion includes several voluminous attachments. As a result, Delta King's analysis of the voluminous records will require more time than is currently afforded by the existing briefing schedule. Delta King believes it will be prejudiced if it must complete its analysis of the voluminous records within the current schedule.

Plaintiff and Delta King met and conferred and the Parties believe that a modest extension of the briefing schedule and related hearing date is reasonable and will afford Delta King sufficient time to complete its review of the voluminous records. Therefore, Plaintiff and Delta King respectfully request that the deadline for Delta King to file its Opposition to Plaintiff's Fee Motion be extended from July 13, 2015, to July 27, 2015. Plaintiff's Reply deadline would be due on August 3, 2015 and hearing on this matter on August 18, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer