BODNAR v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, EDCV 11-92-DSF (OP). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120413597
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections filed by Plaintiff, de novo IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint; and (3) dismissing th
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections filed by Plaintiff, de novo IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint; and (3) dismissing the..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections filed by Plaintiff, de novo
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint; and (3) dismissing the Complaint with prejudice as untimely.
Source: Leagle
