Meighan v. Montgomery, CV 17-06667-SJO (SHK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190308810
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Even after the Court granted an extension of time to file any objections to the R&R, no objections were filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Even after the Court granted an extension of time to file any objections to the R&R, no objections were filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. I..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Even after the Court granted an extension of time to file any objections to the R&R, no objections were filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
