FOKES v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, 2:13-CV-01625-MCE-CKD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140319e74
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. The parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED as set forth in this Order. Defendant Citibank, N.A. (improperly sued herein as "Citimortgage, Inc. d/b/a Citibank, N.A.") ("Citibank") is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his/its attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred. See ECF No. 17. The parties request that the Court reserve jurisdiction to
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. The parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED as set forth in this Order. Defendant Citibank, N.A. (improperly sued herein as "Citimortgage, Inc. d/b/a Citibank, N.A.") ("Citibank") is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his/its attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred. See ECF No. 17. The parties request that the Court reserve jurisdiction to ..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
The parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED as set forth in this Order. Defendant Citibank, N.A. (improperly sued herein as "Citimortgage, Inc. d/b/a Citibank, N.A.") ("Citibank") is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his/its attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred. See ECF No. 17.
The parties request that the Court reserve jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the Settlement and General Release Agreement entered into by Plaintiff and Citibank and to resolve any and all disputes arising out of such Agreement. See ECF No. 17. The Court does so, but only to the extent permitted by law. See Keeling v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n (9th Cir. 1991) 937 F.2d 408, 410; compare Delay v. Gordon, 475 F.3d 1039, 1045 n.11 (9th Cir. 2007) with In re Hunter, 66 F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir. 1995). The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
