Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yep v. Johnson, 2:18-cv-02716-KJM. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200213c39 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , Chief District Judge . On September 25, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause why debtor-appellant Wallen Yep's bankruptcy appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. See Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 4. The order stated Yep had 21 days to file a response, and that his failure to respond to the order would result in dismissal of his appeal. The clerk of court served the or
More

ORDER

On September 25, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause why debtor-appellant Wallen Yep's bankruptcy appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. See Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 4. The order stated Yep had 21 days to file a response, and that his failure to respond to the order would result in dismissal of his appeal.

The clerk of court served the order on Yep's address on file with the court and it was returned as undeliverable on October 7, 2019. It is Yep's duty to keep the court advised as to his current mailing address. E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). The sixty-three days allowed under Local Rule 183(b) have now elapsed. Accordingly, the court now DISMISSES debtor-appellant's action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer