Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOE v. COUNTY OF KERN, 1:15-CV-01641-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170914749 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . JOINT STIPULATION COME NOW the parties jointly and stipulate as follows: The parties have achieved a written settlement agreement, which is now fully executed and binding. Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: September 1, 2017 CHAIN-COHN-STILES By:
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE

JOINT STIPULATION

COME NOW the parties jointly and stipulate as follows:

The parties have achieved a written settlement agreement, which is now fully executed and binding. Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Dated: September 1, 2017 CHAIN-COHN-STILES By: /s/ Neil Gehlawat1 Neil K. Gehlawat Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe Dated: September 1, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH By: /s/ Thomas Seabauqh2 Thomas C. Seabaugh, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jane Doe Dated: September 1, 2017 WEAKLEY AND ARENDT By: /s/ Jame D. Weakley3 James D. Weakley Leslie M. Dillahunty Attorneys for Defendant George Anderson

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Authorized on September 1, 2017
2. Authorized on September 1, 2017
3. Authorized on September 1, 2017
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer