BERLIN MEDIA ART E.K. v. DOES 1-146, 2:11-cv-2039 KJM GGH. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120509834
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 08, 2012
Latest Update: May 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On May 3, 2012, a scheduling conference was held in the above captioned case. No defendants appeared as they have not been identified in the docket of this case. Plaintiff informed the court that it is still in the process of identifying Doe defendants. Plaintiff shall have an additional forty-five (45) days in which to identify in an amended complaint the present Doe defendants. Service of those defendants shall be made within thirty days (30) of t
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. On May 3, 2012, a scheduling conference was held in the above captioned case. No defendants appeared as they have not been identified in the docket of this case. Plaintiff informed the court that it is still in the process of identifying Doe defendants. Plaintiff shall have an additional forty-five (45) days in which to identify in an amended complaint the present Doe defendants. Service of those defendants shall be made within thirty days (30) of th..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
On May 3, 2012, a scheduling conference was held in the above captioned case. No defendants appeared as they have not been identified in the docket of this case. Plaintiff informed the court that it is still in the process of identifying Doe defendants.
Plaintiff shall have an additional forty-five (45) days in which to identify in an amended complaint the present Doe defendants. Service of those defendants shall be made within thirty days (30) of the expiration of the 45 day period.
After the expiration of the 45 day period in which to file an amended complaint, no further amendments to the complaint adding identified defendants will be approved.
A further scheduling conference will be held with all parties before the undersigned on August 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Each party shall file an individual scheduling statement in accordance with the previous format ordered by the court. See Order of August 2, 2011.
Source: Leagle
