Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GONZALEZ v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., 1:14-cv-1324 SKO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141030898 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to L.R. 144(a), Counsel are stipulating to extend the time within which Defendant Schneider Electric USA, Inc., dba Pelco by Schneider Electric ("Schneider Electric") to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' complaint, filed August 22, 2014. The parties agree to extend Defendant Schneider Electric's deadline to file an answer or a responsive pleading to the compla
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to L.R. 144(a), Counsel are stipulating to extend the time within which Defendant Schneider Electric USA, Inc., dba Pelco by Schneider Electric ("Schneider Electric") to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' complaint, filed August 22, 2014.

The parties agree to extend Defendant Schneider Electric's deadline to file an answer or a responsive pleading to the complaint from September 26, 2014 to October 10, 2014.

I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint, and finding GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, hereby GRANTS the Parties' stipulated request, and extends Defendant Schneider Electric's deadline to file an answer or a responsive pleading to the complaint from September 26, 2014, to October 10, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer