Filed: Sep. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO SET MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND; ORDER THEREON ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Defendants Marquez Brothers International, Inc., Marquez Brothers Enterprises, Inc., Marquez Brothers Foods, Inc., Marquez Brothers Southern California, Inc., Marquez Brothers Nevada, Inc., and Marquez Brothers Texas I, Inc. ("Defendants", collectively, the "Parties") by and through their counsel of record stipulate
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO SET MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND; ORDER THEREON ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Defendants Marquez Brothers International, Inc., Marquez Brothers Enterprises, Inc., Marquez Brothers Foods, Inc., Marquez Brothers Southern California, Inc., Marquez Brothers Nevada, Inc., and Marquez Brothers Texas I, Inc. ("Defendants", collectively, the "Parties") by and through their counsel of record stipulate ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO SET MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND; ORDER THEREON
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Defendants Marquez Brothers International, Inc., Marquez Brothers Enterprises, Inc., Marquez Brothers Foods, Inc., Marquez Brothers Southern California, Inc., Marquez Brothers Nevada, Inc., and Marquez Brothers Texas I, Inc. ("Defendants", collectively, the "Parties") by and through their counsel of record stipulate as follows:
1. Defendants' deadline to answer the operative complaint shall be extended one week to October 9, 2017.
2. The Parties previously stipulated, and this Court ordered that "[w]ithin five court days of the Court's issuance of an order on the pending motion to dismiss, the Parties must file a stipulation setting forth proposed dates for the Mandatory Scheduling Conference that are at least fourteen days after the pleadings close." The deadline for such stipulation is September 25, 2017.
3. On September 18, 2017, Senior District Judge Ishii issued an Order denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (9/18/17 Order, ECF No. 28). Thus, the Parties have five court days or until September 25, 2017 to file a stipulation on proposed dates. On September 25, 2017, the Parties received an email from the Court stating its availability for the Mandatory Scheduling Conference. The available dates include December 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
4. The Parties stipulate to the scheduling of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference on December 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
For good cause shown as stated by the Parties' stipulation, the Court orders that:
1. Defendants' deadline to answer the operative complaint shall be extended one week to October 9, 2017.
2. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference shall be scheduled for December 7, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. The Court grants telephonic appearances at said conference with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
