Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BROOKS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., C12-4935 EMC (JSC). (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130925a08 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING STAY; ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs CYNTHIA BROOKS and JACOB SWOYER (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant U.S. BANK, N.A. ("Defendant") (collectively "Parties") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike on August 30, 2013 (Dkt. 37); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike on September 13, 2013 (Dkt. 38); WHEREAS, Defendant's reply in support of its
More

STIPULATION REGARDING STAY; ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs CYNTHIA BROOKS and JACOB SWOYER (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant U.S. BANK, N.A. ("Defendant") (collectively "Parties") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike on August 30, 2013 (Dkt. 37);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike on September 13, 2013 (Dkt. 38);

WHEREAS, Defendant's reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike on August 30, 2013 is due on September 20, 2013 pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(c);

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike is currently set for October 17, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, a further Case Management Conference is currently set for October 17, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.;

WHEREAS, the Parties have been working towards a resolution of this case with the assistance of Magistrate Judge Corley;

WHEREAS, the Parties expect to enter into a written settlement, which they will submit for preliminary approval with the Court;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and request an Order setting forth the following:

1. The hearing regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike and the further Case Management Conference are continued to December 5, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.; and 2. The deadline for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike is continued to November 21, 2013; 3. The case is stayed pending settlement; and 4. Discovery is stayed pending settlement.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer