Arruda v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:15-CV-02224-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160429a07
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time to file Plaintiff's opening brief. Counsel for the Plaintiff has been in urgent care very ill and unable to complete the briefing at this time. Additionally, counsel is a sole practitioner and has no additional attorneys to help her at
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time to file Plaintiff's opening brief. Counsel for the Plaintiff has been in urgent care very ill and unable to complete the briefing at this time. Additionally, counsel is a sole practitioner and has no additional attorneys to help her at t..
More
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time to file Plaintiff's opening brief.
Counsel for the Plaintiff has been in urgent care very ill and unable to complete the briefing at this time. Additionally, counsel is a sole practitioner and has no additional attorneys to help her at this time. As a result, counsel for Plaintiff requires additional time to draft the opening brief. Plaintiff requests a 30-day extension of time to May 25, 2016.
The parties stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
The Court adopts the parties' stipulation as outlined above. Plaintiff's opening brief is now due on May 25, 2016. The Court's Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) is modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
