Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 16-cv-01193-JSC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181204820
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS Re: Dkt. No. 167 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Tammi Fuqua, proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed a notice of appeal and a request for trial transcripts at no cost. Pursuant to statute, before authorizing the provision of transcripts using public funds, "the trial judge or a circuit judge [must] certif[y] that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented b
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS Re: Dkt. No. 167 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Tammi Fuqua, proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed a notice of appeal and a request for trial transcripts at no cost. Pursuant to statute, before authorizing the provision of transcripts using public funds, "the trial judge or a circuit judge [must] certif[y] that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS
Re: Dkt. No. 167
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Tammi Fuqua, proceeding in forma pauperis, has filed a notice of appeal and a request for trial transcripts at no cost. Pursuant to statute, before authorizing the provision of transcripts using public funds, "the trial judge or a circuit judge [must] certif[y] that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal." 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). Fuqua's notice of appeal does not identify the basis for her appeal. In order to determine whether Fuqua qualifies for transcripts at no cost, Fuqua is ORDERED to file a response identifying the grounds for her appeal no later than December 14, 2018.
The response ordered here is intended only to determine whether there is any non-frivolous basis for appeal that requires consideration of trial transcripts, and should not be construed as limiting in any way the arguments that Fuqua may raise on appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
