Calip v. Ciox Health, LLC, 3:16-cv-07231-JST. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180116921
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANT'S ABILITY TO RE-REMOVE CASE IN LIGHT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The instant Action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, for purposes of seeking approval of the global settlement reached between the Parties to this Action and the related matter,
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANT'S ABILITY TO RE-REMOVE CASE IN LIGHT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The instant Action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, for purposes of seeking approval of the global settlement reached between the Parties to this Action and the related matter, ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANT'S ABILITY TO RE-REMOVE CASE IN LIGHT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
PROPOSED ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The instant Action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, for purposes of seeking approval of the global settlement reached between the Parties to this Action and the related matter, titled Rutledge, et al. vs. HealthPort Technologies, et al., pending in Alameda Superior Court, Case No. RG16835813 ("Rutledge").
2. This order of remand is made without prejudice to Defendant, Ciox Health, LLC's ability to re-remove this Action to this Court if, for any reason, the global settlement is not approved or consummated.
Source: Leagle