Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vickers v. Mak, 2:17-cv-02612-TLN-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180305774 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS NATION'S GIANT HAMBURGERS NO. 22 AND NATION'S FOODSERVICE, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cleveland Vickers ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nation's Giant Hamburgers No. 22 and Nation's Foodservice, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, previously entered into a stipulation granting Defendants to and including Febru
More

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS NATION'S GIANT HAMBURGERS NO. 22 AND NATION'S FOODSERVICE, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cleveland Vickers ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Nation's Giant Hamburgers No. 22 and Nation's Foodservice, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, previously entered into a stipulation granting Defendants to and including February 23, 2018 to file a responsive pleading in this matter (Dkt. 8);

WHEREAS, Defendants are determining representation;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties that Defendants may have to and including March 5, 2018 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, Nation's Giant Hamburgers No. 22 and Nation's Foodservice, Inc., shall have to and including March 5, 2018 within which to file responsive pleadings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer