Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JANNEY v. GENERAL MILLS, 3:12-cv-03919-WHO (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131022802 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiffs Judith Janney, Amy McKendrick, Sean Bohac and Gabrial Rojas ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant General Mills, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully submit the following discovery schedule for this Court's consideration. The Parties hereby request that the Court enter the following discovery schedule: Factual Discovery cut-off December 15, 2014 1 Plaintiffs' Di
More

STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Judith Janney, Amy McKendrick, Sean Bohac and Gabrial Rojas ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant General Mills, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully submit the following discovery schedule for this Court's consideration. The Parties hereby request that the Court enter the following discovery schedule:

Factual Discovery cut-off December 15, 20141 Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Class Certification Experts July 1, 2014 (and corresponding Reports) Defendant's Disclosure of Class Certification Experts August 1, 2014 (and corresponding Reports) Deposition of Class Certification Experts September 1, 2014 Disclosure of Rebuttal Class Certification Experts October 31, 2014 (and corresponding Reports) Deposition of Rebuttal Class Certification Experts and Reports November 12, 2014 Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification September 22, 2014 Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Class Certification October 17, 2014 Plaintiff's Class Certification Reply November 7, 2014 Parties' Supplemental Briefing Re: Rebuttal November 19, 2014 Certification Experts (10-page limit) Hearing on Motion for Class Certification December 3, 2014 Trial July 6, 2015

STIPULATION AND AGREED TO BY:

Pursuant to Stipulation, and modified to include a Pre-Trial Conference on June 16, 2015, it is

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Parties have agreed discovery will not be bifurcated and that merits discovery will proceed simultaneously with class certification discovery. Notwithstanding the December 15, 2014, discovery cutoff, the parties agree to meet and confer regarding the necessity of supplemental merits discovery, and the scope of such discovery, in light of the Court's Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. The parties agree to file a joint submission within 21 days of issuance of the Court's Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, and that any such discovery will be limited to a 90-day period.

The Parties will propose a separate schedule regarding discovery of non-class certification experts who will testify at trial 45 days after the Court's ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer