HUNT v. CONES, 4:13CV00740 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140530964
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: May 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] is granted. 2. Plaintiff's claims aga
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] is granted. 2. Plaintiff's claims agai..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] is granted.
2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Huffman, Lasker, and Randall are dismissed with prejudice.
3. It is further certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
