Mora-Espinosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:17-cv-02955-MMD-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171221e72
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR MOTION PRACTICE REGARDING MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO NEVADA DISTRICT COURT-FIRST REQUEST MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff IVAN MORA-ESPINOSA (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (hereinafter "Walmart") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to extend time to file responding motions pertaining to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Nevada Distr
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR MOTION PRACTICE REGARDING MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO NEVADA DISTRICT COURT-FIRST REQUEST MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff IVAN MORA-ESPINOSA (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (hereinafter "Walmart") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to extend time to file responding motions pertaining to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Nevada Distri..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR MOTION PRACTICE REGARDING MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO NEVADA DISTRICT COURT-FIRST REQUEST
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff IVAN MORA-ESPINOSA (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (hereinafter "Walmart") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to extend time to file responding motions pertaining to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Nevada District Court, originally filed on December 5, 2017. ECF No. 5 (D. Nev. Dec. 5, 2017).
Specifically, the Parties stipulate that Walmart's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Nevada District Court shall be due no later than Tuesday, January 9, 2018, and Plaintiff's Reply in support of his Motion to Remand Case to Nevada District Court shall be due no later than Tuesday, January 16, 2018. The Parties request this additional time so that they may attempt to resolve this matter without having to incurring additional costs associated with motion practice.
The Parties aver that good cause exists for this request pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, and this is the first such stipulation for extension of time to stay motion practice regarding this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
