Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

POOSHS v. ALTRIA GROUP, INC., C 04-01221-PJH-JCS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160203872 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2016
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGELINE DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS [DR. FIGLAR] PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties January 21, 2015 Joint Submission regarding the page and line designations, counter designations and objections to the deposition of Dr. James Figlar taken on June 8, 2011 (Vol. I); June 9, 2011 (Vol. II); June 10, 2011 (Vol. III.); August 15, 2011 (Vol. VI.); and August 16, 2011 (Vol. VII.). The Courts rulings are as follows: Testimony
More

PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGELINE DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS [DR. FIGLAR]

The Court has reviewed the parties January 21, 2015 Joint Submission regarding the page and line designations, counter designations and objections to the deposition of Dr. James Figlar taken on June 8, 2011 (Vol. I); June 9, 2011 (Vol. II); June 10, 2011 (Vol. III.); August 15, 2011 (Vol. VI.); and August 16, 2011 (Vol. VII.). The Courts rulings are as follows:

Testimony Defendant's Objections Court's Ruling Dr. James Figler, 6/8/2011(Vol. 1) 8:10-12 No objection 9:5-12 No objection 15:6-19 No objection 27:12-27:22 No objection 27:23-29:2 Asked and Answered (See 27:12 — 22); Misleading; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Repetitive; Post-1987 Sustained 29:5-30:16 Asked and Answered (See 27:12 — 22); Misleading; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Repetitive; Post-1987 Sustained 35:23-36:1 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Lack of Foundation; Argumentative; Speculative; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Overruled 36:6-25 Beyond the scope; Calls for Legal Conclusion; Vague; Ambiguous; Argumentative; Speculative; Unfair Prejudice and calculated to inflame jury; Williams/State Farm (Nexus/harm to others); Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Ammoniation/Additives Overruled 39:4-16 Beyond the scope; Calls for a legal conclusion; Vague, Ambiguous and overbroad; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus/harm to others); Non-testimony material Sustained 41:5-42:4 No objection 42:6-12 No objection 42:14-16 No objection 42:19-43:23 No objection 46:7-24 No objection 48:1-51:12 No objection 52:8-53:5 No objection 55:25-56:6 No objection 56:11 No objection 56:13:18 No objection 57:25-59:11 No objection 59:21-61:11 No objection 61:17-24 No objection 62:8-20 No objection 62:22-23 No objection 62:25-63:13 No objection 63:16-63:16 No objection 63:18-63:18 No objection 63:24-64:7 No objection 65:5-66:3 No objection 66:13-16 No objection 67:7-17 No objection 71:10-20 No objection 73:7-11 No objection 75:9-23 No objection 76:1-15 No objection 76:19-22 No objection 76:24-77:5 No objection 77:7-9 No objection 77:11-78:8 No objection 79:3-13 No objection 80:11-12 No objection 80:14-16 No objection 80:19-81:14 No objection 81:17-82:3 No objection 82:5-11 No objection 82:21-83:7 No objection 84:13-25 No objection 85:2-86:12 No objection 86:22-87:4 No objection 88:6-89:22 No objection 90:8-91:5 No objection 91:24-92:2 Asked and Answered (see 91:2-5); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice Sustained 94:6-9 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Vague as to Time Sustained 94:12-25 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Non-testimony material; Vague as to Time; Argumentative Sustained 95:3-95:3 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Vague as to Time; Asked and Answered Sustained 95:5-9 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Vague as to Time; Asked and Answered Sustained 96:2-7 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Post-1987 Sustained 96:25-97:12 No objection 97:22-98:12 No objection 99:4-100:8 No objection 100:10-16 No objection 101:7-20 No objection 102:1-103:17 No objection 104:2-104:2 No objection 104:6-104:6 No objection 105:1-14 No objection 105:17-21 No objection 105:22-106:14 No objection 107:15-18 Irrelevant; Document speaks for itself; Mischaracterizes document; Unfair Prejudice; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 107:21-108:2 Irrelevant; Document speaks for itself; Mischaracterizes document; Unfair Prejudice; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 108:4-108:4 Irrelevant; Document speaks for itself; Mischaracterizes document; Unfair Prejudice; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 108:7-16 Irrelevant; Document speaks for itself; Mischaracterizes document; Unfair Prejudice; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 108:19-109:4 Irrelevant; Document speaks for itself; Mischaracterizes document; Unfair Prejudice; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 109:6-20 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Asked and Answered Sustained 110:15-112:5 No objection 112:15-113:8 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative; Speculative Sustained 113:11-114:21 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative; Document speaks for itself Sustained 116:4-18 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Sustained 116:20-22 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Sustained 116:25-116:25 Irrelevant; Incomplete Designation; Counsel testifying; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative; Asked and Answered Sustained 117:2-3 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative; Asked and Answered Sustained 122:22-123:5 No objection 124:3-125:14 No objection 126:4-129:10 No objection 131:7-132:4 No objection 139:5-14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First amendment; Document speaks for itself; Hearsay; Bad conduct evidence Overruled 139:16-141:11 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; William/State Farm; First amendment; Hearsay; Bad conduct evidence Overruled 141:17-142:25 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; William/State Farm (Nexus), First amendment; Document speaks for itself; Hearsay; Bad conduct evidence Sustained 143:21-24 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom no Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official Sustained 144:4-5 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking of official from Reynolds Sustained 144:7-9 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 144:11-21 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 145:8-11 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; Misleading; Speculative; Lacks foundation; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 145:13-14 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Lacks foundation; Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 145:19-24 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 146:3-148:1 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 148:4-5 Authenticity (document not found in files); Exhibit not related to Defendant; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; No high-ranking official from Reynolds Sustained 152:9-21 Authenticity (not an RJR document); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 153:4-154:8 Authenticity (not an RJR document); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 154:23-155:23 Authenticity (not an RJR document); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 156:2-17 Authenticity (not an RJR document); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 156:19-22 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Misstates evidence; Misleading; Unfair Prejudice Sustained 156:24-157:5 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Misstates evidence; Misleading; Unfair Prejudice Sustained 158:7-17 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition), Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 158:20-159:3 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition), Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 159:14-159:24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition), Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 159:25-162:3 No objection 166:21-167:14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First Amendment (advertising); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 169:24-171:19 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus), First Amendment (advertising); Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself Sustained 173:3-18 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Speculative Sustained 174:2-13 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Speculative Sustained 178:14-179:1 Authenticity (not clean copy); Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; First Amendment; Bad conduct evidence; Cumulative Sustained 179:6-180:1 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm; Bad conduct evidence; Hearsay; Hearsay within Hearsay; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 180:5-22 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm; Bad conduct evidence; Document speaks for itself; Hearsay; Hearsay within Hearsay; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 187:18-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Williams/State Farm (nexus); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 188:24-190:1 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Williams/State Farm (nexus); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 190:8-191:5 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Williams/State Farm (nexus); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 191:7-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Counsel testifying; Williams/State Farm (Freedom to Petition); Speculative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 192:12-15 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Counsel testifying; Williams/State Farm (Freedom to Petition); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 192:17-23 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Counsel testifying; Williams/State Farm (Freedom to Petition); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 192:25-193:10 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Counsel testifying; Williams/State Farm (Freedom to Petition); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 193:23-194:1 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Counsel testifying; Williams/State Farm (Freedom to Petition); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 195:5-18 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Counsel testifying; Argumentative; Williams/State Farm (nexus) Sustained 195:20-196:6 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Counsel testifying; Argumentative; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 217:18-218:13 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Bad conduce evidence; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 219:6-221:4 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Counsel testifying; Document speaks for itself; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 221:7-8 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Counsel testifying; Document speaks for itself; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 221:10-14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Counsel testifying; Document speaks for itself; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 228:21-230:6 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm, Bad conduct evidence; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 231:10-19 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm, Bad conduct evidence; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 231:21-232:14 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm, Bad conduct evidence; Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 232:16-19 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm, Bad conduct evidence; Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 232:21-23 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Sustained Williams/State Farm, Bad conduct evidence; Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 262:19-24 Vague; Counsel testifying; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 263:7-264:17 Vague; Counsel testifying; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 264:20-264:20 Vague; Counsel testifying; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 264:23-266:21 Vague; Counsel testifying; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Vague; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 266:24-267:9 Vague; Counsel testifying; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Argumentative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 267:13-17 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Speculative; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 267:19-268:22 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Speculative; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus), Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 268:25-269:4 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Speculative; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus), Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 269:17-22 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Speculative; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus), Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 269:24-270:5 Beyond the scope; Vague; Ambiguous; Speculative; Argumentative; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus), Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 271:7-272:13 No objection 273:2-5 No objection 273:7-9 No objection 273:18-20 No objection 273:22-274:18 No objection 275:15-276:22 No objection 277:21-278:6 No objection 278:8-25 No objection 279:3-12 No objection 279:14-280:13 No objection 280:15-21 No objection Defendants' Plaintiff's Objections Court's Ruling Counter Designations Dr. James Figlar, 6/8/2011. (Vol. 1) 15:20-16:3 No objection 69:19-70:16 No objection 70:18:70:22 No objection 100:17-101:6 No objection 129:11-130:3 No objection Testimony Defendant's Objections Court's Ruling Dr. James Figlar, 6/9/2011 (Vol. 2) 297:11-23 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); Bad conduct evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 299:24-301:23 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 302:21-303:13 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Lack of Foundation; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Overruled 303:21-304:2 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Argumentative; Document speaks for itself; Misleading; Mischaracterizes evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Sustained 304:4-10 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Argumentative; Document speaks for itself; Misleading; Mischaracterizes evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Sustained 304:12-13 Irrelevant; Lack of Foundation; Argumentative; Document speaks for itself; Misleading; Mischaracterizes evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case Sustained 306:14-16 No objection 307:10-20 No objection 309:9-14 No objection 309:22-310:5 No objection 310:7-9 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Asked and Answered (beginning at (see 309:22-310:5) "R.J. Reynolds") Sustained 310:11-14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Asked and Answered (see 309:22-310:5 Sustained 310:25-311:2 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Asked and Answered (see 309:22-310:5) Sustained 311:4-6 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Asked and Answered Sustained (see 309:22-310:5) 325:21-326:6 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); No high-ranking official from Reynolds; Sustained 326:8-327:21 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); No high-ranking official from Reynolds; Non-testimony material; Foundation; Speculative; Counsel testifying Sustained 329:15-330:12 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); No high-ranking official from Reynolds; Foundation; Speculative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 330:15-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); No high-ranking official from Reynolds; Foundation; Speculative Sustained 333:6-13 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (nexus); Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 334:22-335:12 Argumentative; Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 335:14-336:8 Argumentative; Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 336:10-16 Beyond the scope; Counsel testifying; Speculative; Argumentative; Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 336:19-337:4 Beyond the scope; Counsel testifying; Speculative; Argumentative; Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 337:6-338:2 Argumentative; Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 341:8-12 Asked and Answered 341:16-19 Asked and Answered 341:21-22 Asked and Answered 355:25-356:14 Counsel Commentary; Cumulative; Misstates evidence; Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Lack of Foundation; Post-1987; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 356:17-357:3 Misstates evidence; Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Lack of Foundation Sustained 361:24-362:4 Speculative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence Sustained 365:19-366:16 Speculative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Overruled 366:18-20 Speculative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad Overruled conduct evidence; Design Defect No Longer At Issue In This Case 367:13-370:14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Cumulative; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Argumentative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 372:19-373:14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Cumulative; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Argumentative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 373:16-374:16 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Bad conduct evidence; Cumulative; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Argumentative; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 374:18-377:2 Improper designation Sustained 377:14-23 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Beyond the scope; Document speaks for itself; Bad conduct evidence; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm; Sustained 378:1-3 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Beyond the scope; Document speaks for itself; Bad conduct evidence; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Sustained 378:6-21 Misstates and mischaracterizes evidence; Argumentative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Hearsay; Document speaks for itself; Incomplete Designation; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 378:23-379:24 Lack of Foundation; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 385:14-18 No objection 388:18-389:16 No objection 391:1-11 Irrelevant; Cumulative; Asked and Answered (see 24:9-13); Unfair Prejudice Sustained 391:23-393:20 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm (Nexus); First Amendment (advertising; Freedom to Petition); Document speaks for itself; Bad conduct evidence; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 397:20-398:11 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment (advertising); Bad conduct evidence; Document speaks for itself; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 400:9-401:7 Cumulative; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First (beginning at "It amendment (advertising); Speculative; Express was") Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 406:20-407:20 Irrelevant; Cumulative; Vague; Misleading; Unfair Prejudice; Speculative Sustained 425:13-25 No objection 426:5-17 No objection 427:11-429:5 No objection 430:24-431:11 No objection 432:11-433:15 No objection 437:18-437:24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Argumentative; Outside Scope; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969); Design Defect No Longer AT Issue In This Case; Non-Lung Cancer Conditions (Addition) Overruled 437:25-438:10 No objection Defendants' Plaintiff's Objection Court's Ruling Counter Designations Dr. James Figlar, 6/9/2011 (Vol. 2) 439:23-440:9 No objection 442:5-442:25 No objection Testimony Defendant's Objections Court's Ruling Dr. James Figlar, 6/10/2011 (Vol. 3) 612:7-613:6 Beyond the scope; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Speculative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Overruled 613:8-13 Beyond the scope; Irrelvant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Speculative; Incomplete Designation; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Overruled 613:15-17 Beyond the scope; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice Sustained 614:13-615:11 Beyond the scope; Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 624:8-22 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Document speaks for itself; No high-ranking official from Reynolds; Cumulative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 630:24-631:15 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment; Document speaks for itself; Asked and Answered (see 629:03-630:01); Cumulative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 633:12-634:22 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment; Document speaks for itself; Asked and Answered (see 629:03-630:01); Cumulative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 657:20-661:4 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Speculative; Vague; Calls for Legal Conclusion; Beyond the scope; Express Preemption; Cumulative; Unsegregated Sustained Aggregate Harm 661:9-25 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Beyond the scope; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 662:8-14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Beyond the scope; Speculative; Cumulative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 664:5-8 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Vague; Beyond the scope; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Sustained 677:15-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment (advertising); Document speaks for itself; Calls for a legal conclusion Sustained 709:4-13 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Vague; Beyond the scope; Cumulative; Asked and Answered Sustained 711:17-20 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Vague; Beyond the scope; Cumulative; Asked and Answered Sustained 711:23-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Beyond the scope; Cumulative; Asked and Answered Sustained 720:20-721:15 No objection 733:13-736:5 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Inflame; Foundation; Document speaks for itself Sustained 736:13-737:7 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Inflame; Foundation; Document speaks for itself; Vague Sustained 738:10-16 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Inflame; Foundation; Calls for Legal Conclusion; Cumulative; Speculative; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained 739:1-10 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Confusion; Vague; Inflame; Foundation; Calls for Legal Conclusion; Cumulative Sustained 739:24-740:14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Document speaks for itself Sustained 741:3-18 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Document speaks for itself; Sustained 741:19-22 Improper Designation Sustained 741:24-742:5 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Document speaks for itself; Sustained 743:4-745:22 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Foundation; Document speaks for itself; Meaning or Intent of Company Documents Sustained Defendants' Plaintiff's Objections Court's Ruling Counter Designations Dr. James Figlar, 8/15/2011 (Vol. 6) 1308:15-1309:20 No objection 1311:9-1314:6 No objection 1314:12-1314:19 No objection 1315:1-1315:9 No objection 1315:18-1316:5 No objection 1316:7-1316:19 No objection 1316:21-1317:5 No objection 1320:2-1320:25 Irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial (403) Overruled Irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, post-1987 evidence, 1321:3-1321:17 lacking in foundation, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained Irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, post-1987 evidence, 1321:19-1322:14 lacking in foundation, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained Irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, post-1987 evidence, 1322:16-1322:23 lacking in foundation, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained Irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, post-1987 evidence, 1324:7-1324:10 lacking in foundation, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained Irrelevant, vague, ambiguous, post-1987 evidence, 1324:12-1324:12 lacking in foundation, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1325:3-1325:5 (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1325:7-1325:17 (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1325:19-1325:21 (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1326:2-1326:6 (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1326:9-1326:9 (403) Sustained Irrelevant, post-1987 evidence, unfairly prejudicial 1326:11-1326:14 (403) Sustained Vague, ambiguous, irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial 1356:23-1357:1 (403), post-1987 evidence. Overruled Vague, ambiguous, irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial 1356:3-1357:4 (403), post-1987 evidence. Overruled 1357:17-1357:20 Design evidence, irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained 1357:22-1358:17 Design evidence, irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial (403) Sustained 1358:19-1359:24 No objection 1360:1-1360:9 No objection 1360:11:1360:25 No objection 1361:8-1362:23 No objection 1363:2-1363:4 No objection 1363:6-1363:13 No objection 1370:22-1371:1 No objection 1371:3-1371:20 No objection 1371:22-1372:1 No objection 1376:16-1376:21 No objection 1377:11-1377:17 No objection 1378:3-1378:6 No objection 1378:8-1378:9 No objection 1378:11-1379:14 No objection 1379:16-1380:4 No objection 1380:6-1380:11 No objection 1380:13-1380:13 No objection 1383:15-1384:7 No objection 1384:9-1384:16 No objection 1384:18-1385:4 No objection 1385:6-1386:6 No objection 1386:8-1386:14 No objection 1386:16-1386:25 No objection 1387:2-1387:17 No objection 1387:19-1387:23 No objection 1388:15-1388:19 No objection 1388:23-1389:9 No objection 1389:10-1389:25 No objection 1390:10-1390:13 No objection 1390:15-1391:4 No objection 1391:6-1391:23 No objection 1391:25-1391:25 No objection 1392:2-1392:3 No objection 1392:5-1392:22 No objection 1392:24-1393:7 No objection 1393:9-1393:15 No objection 1393:17-1393:24 No objection 1394:1-1394:8 No objection 1394:10-1394:14 No objection 1394:16-1395:5 No objection 1395:7-1395:16 No objection 1395:18-1395:18 No objection 1463:3-1463:22 No objection 1463:24-1463:24 No objection 1465:5-1465:6 No objection 1465:9-1465:25 No objection 1466:3-1466:3 No objection 1466:5-1466:25 No objection 1467:3-1467:4 No objection 1467:6-1467:10 No objection 1467:12-1467:23 No objection 1467:25-1468:1 No objection 1468:3-1469:13 No objection 1469:15-1469:20 No objection 1469:22-1469:23 No objection 1469:25:1470:2 No objection 1470:4-1470:5 No objection 1473:21-1474:1 No objection 1474:3-1474:9 No objection 1474:11-1475:12 No objection 1475:14-1476:12 No objection 1476:14-1477:22 No objection 1478:3-1479:2 No objection 1479:4-1479:14 No objection 1525:2-1526:3 No objection 1526:11-1526:13 No objection 1526:15-1526:19 No objection 1526:21-1527:6 No objection 1527:9-1528:4 No objection 1528:6-1528:21 No objection 1528:23-1529:14 No objection 1529:16-1530:8 No objection 1530:10-1530:14 No objection Testimony Defendant's Objections Court's Ruling Dr. James Figlar, 8/16/2011 (Vol. 7) 1643:13-1645:15 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Speculative; Leading; Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative Overruled 1646:15-25 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative; Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative Overruled 1647:02-1648:16 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative Overruled 1648:18-24 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative Overruled 1649:01-1649:01 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative Overruled 1651:09-19 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Williams/State Farm; Cumulative Mischaracterizes Witness Testimony; Argumentative; Unsegregated Aggregate Harm Overruled 1674:21-1675:14 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm; Argumentative; Asked and Answered; First Amendment; Vague Overruled 1675:16-17 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; Cumulative; Williams/State Farm; Argumentative; Asked and Answered; First Amendment; Vague Overruled 1702:2-1703:5 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 1703:7-1704:6 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment; Sustained Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) 1704:8-1705:8 Irrelevant; Unfair Prejudice; First Amendment; Express Preemption (Post-July 1, 1969) Sustained 1709:20-1710:13 Irrelevant, Unfair Prejudice, Cumulative Sustained

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer