ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Honorio R. Mallari's ("Plaintiff") ex parte application for (1) a temporary restraining order and (2) order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, both directed against Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and California Reconveyance Company (collectively, "Defendants"). ECF No. 2 ("EPA").1 Plaintiff filed the ex parte application on June 4, 2012, seeking immediate injunctive relief to forestall Defendants' foreclosure of Plaintiff's home, which was scheduled to occur on June 13, 2012. See EPA ¶ 2.

The Court twice attempted to give Plaintiff a hearing on his ex parte application, first on June 8, then again on June 12. See ECF Nos. 10 ("June 8 Minutes"), 12 ("June 12 Minutes"). On both occasions, counsel for Plaintiff appeared and admitted that Defendants had not been served with notice of the hearing. Both times, the Court declined to hear the matter. After the second attempt, the Court removed the matter from its calendar. See June 12 Minutes. The Court heard nothing further from Plaintiff until July 2, when Plaintiff's counsel, along with counsel for Defendants, entered a stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint. ECF No. 14 ("Stip.").

Because Plaintiff has not renewed his attempts to secure ex parte relief, the Court deems the ex parte application to have been withdrawn. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's ex parte application. The denial is made without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.