Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Men Nguyen v. Ocean Angel IV, LLC, 3:16-cv-04023-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180614824 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Defendant OCEAN ANGEL IV, LLC ("Defendant") and plaintiff MEN NGUYEN, Surviving Spouse of TOAN TRAN ("Plaintiff"), hereby jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Trial Date and Associated Deadlines On July 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint for personal injury, negligence under the Jones Act, and breach of the warranty of seaworthiness under the General Maritime Law.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES

Defendant OCEAN ANGEL IV, LLC ("Defendant") and plaintiff MEN NGUYEN, Surviving Spouse of TOAN TRAN ("Plaintiff"), hereby jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Trial Date and Associated Deadlines

On July 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint for personal injury, negligence under the Jones Act, and breach of the warranty of seaworthiness under the General Maritime Law. On May 24, 2017, this Court issued its Scheduling Order regarding ADR and Trial Dates. In that Scheduling Order, this Court set a Trial Date of June 25, 2018. On December 18, 2017, this Court continued the trial date to September 24, 2018, and continued the discovery deadlines accordingly. On March 26, 2018, this Court continued the trial date to November 26, 2018, and continued the discovery deadlines accordingly.

Good cause now exists to continue the trial date and discovery deadlines for the following reasons: (1) counsel for Defendant, Galin Luk, has a conflict with another trial that was scheduled prior to the trial in this matter, which he mistakenly overlooked at the time of the last continuance; (2) late November is the middle of squid-fishing season, and necessary witnesses are likely to be unavailable to testify at that time; (3) the parties continue to discuss settlement with their mediator and remain committed to attempting in good faith to resolve this matter out of court; and (4) the parties have completed fact discovery.

The parties, having met and conferred, agree that an extension to the trial date and pretrial deadlines is therefore warranted, and have agreed upon a new date that complies with both parties' schedules. The parties therefore stipulate and respectfully request that this Court grant the proposed order below and extend the trial date and pretrial deadlines in this matter as follows:

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Fact discovery cut-off June 1, 2018 No change Expert disclosures June 15, 2018 August 15, 2018 Expert rebuttal July 2, 2018 September 4, 2018 Expert discovery cut-off July 30, 2018 September 28, 2018 Deadline to file dispositive August 7, 2018 October 8, 2018 motions Pretrial conference statement due October 19, 2018 January 21, 2019 Pretrial conference November 2, 2018 February 4, 2019 Trial November 26, 2018 February 28, 2019

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the trial date and pretrial deadlines in this matter are continued as set forth below. The Court does not expect to grant any further continuances.

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Fact discovery cut-off June 1, 2018 No change Expert disclosures June 15, 2018 August 15, 2018 Expert rebuttal July 2, 2018 September 4, 2018 Expert discovery cut-off July 30, 2018 September 28, 2018 Deadline to file dispositive August 7, 2018 October 5, 2018 motions Pretrial conference statement due October 19, 2018 January 21, 2019 Pretrial conference November 2, 2018 February 1, 2019 Trial November 26, 2018 February 25, 2019
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer