Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. ex rel. Harman v. BNSF Railway Co., CV 17-59-BLG-SPW. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20180807962 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . The Defendants have filed motions to dismiss without leave to amend (Docs. 22 and 28). The Plaintiffs have reviewed those motions and conferred with the Defendants. As a result, the parties have jointly moved for an order vacating the Court's Preliminary Pretrial Order of May 18, 2018 and all associated dates pending a ruling on these motions, and for an order to extend the briefing schedule on the motions (Doc. 41). Based upon the joint request of
More

ORDER

The Defendants have filed motions to dismiss without leave to amend (Docs. 22 and 28). The Plaintiffs have reviewed those motions and conferred with the Defendants. As a result, the parties have jointly moved for an order vacating the Court's Preliminary Pretrial Order of May 18, 2018 and all associated dates pending a ruling on these motions, and for an order to extend the briefing schedule on the motions (Doc. 41).

Based upon the joint request of the parties and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The parties' joint motion (Doc. 41) is GRANTED;

2. The Court's Preliminary Pretrial Order (Doc. 19) and all associated dates are VACATED pending a ruling by the Court on the Defendants' motions;

3. The Court will issue an appropriate order related to Preliminary Pretrial matters upon the issuance of its ruling in regards to the Defendants' motions.

4. Plaintiffs shall file a response to Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint by August 21, 2018. Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs' response by September 21, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer