FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SPRINGTECH 77376, LLC, CV 12-4631 JCS. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121128a46
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAVE GLASSEL TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JOSEPH C. SPERO, Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Dave Glassel hereby stipulate that the deadline for Defendant Glassel to file an Answer or to file papers responsive to the Complaint in this action shall be extended from November 15, 2012, to November 20, 2012. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Da
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAVE GLASSEL TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JOSEPH C. SPERO, Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Dave Glassel hereby stipulate that the deadline for Defendant Glassel to file an Answer or to file papers responsive to the Complaint in this action shall be extended from November 15, 2012, to November 20, 2012. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Dav..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DAVE GLASSEL TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Dave Glassel hereby stipulate that the deadline for Defendant Glassel to file an Answer or to file papers responsive to the Complaint in this action shall be extended from November 15, 2012, to November 20, 2012.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission and Defendant Dave Glassel hereby stipulate that the deadline for Defendant Glassel to file an Answer or to file papers responsive to the Complaint in this action shall be extended from November 15, 2012, to November 20, 2012.
Source: Leagle
