U.S. v. MALLERY, 1:13-cv-1737-SAB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150518b72
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER (ECF No. 31) FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On March 2, 2015, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference in this action during which the parties indicated that they had reached a tentative settlement. An order issued on this date requiring the parties to file dispositional documents by May 15, 2015. As of th
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER (ECF No. 31) FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On March 2, 2015, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference in this action during which the parties indicated that they had reached a tentative settlement. An order issued on this date requiring the parties to file dispositional documents by May 15, 2015. As of thi..
More
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER
(ECF No. 31)
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On March 2, 2015, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference in this action during which the parties indicated that they had reached a tentative settlement. An order issued on this date requiring the parties to file dispositional documents by May 15, 2015. As of this date, the parties have not filed dispositional documents or otherwise responded to the Court's order.
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of this order why dispositive documents have not yet been filed. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show cause may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
