Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Miyake v. High Hampton Holdings Corp., 2:19-cv-01043-WBS-AC. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200203938 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: SEVENTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 143, 144]; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , Senior District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs WESLEY MIYAKE and LIRA HAN (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant MOJAVE JANE BRANDS, INC., formerly known as High Hampton Holdings Corp. ("Defendant," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties")
More

SEVENTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 143, 144]; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs WESLEY MIYAKE and LIRA HAN (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant MOJAVE JANE BRANDS, INC., formerly known as High Hampton Holdings Corp. ("Defendant," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the above-captioned action on June 6, 2019;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served the Summons and Complaint upon Defendant on July 2, 2019;

WHEREAS, Defendant initially had up to and including September 3, 2019 to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the first stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on August 26, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the second stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on September 11, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the third stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on September 30, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the fourth stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on October 25, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the fifth stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on November 22, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Parties filed the sixth stipulation to extend time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint on December 20, 2019;

WHEREAS, Defendant has up to and including January 31, 2020 to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Parties are in their final stages of finalizing their settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, in light of ongoing settlement negotiations, the Parties have agreed pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, to respectfully request this Court's approval of a seventh extension of time, so that Defendant shall now have up to and including February 28, 2020 to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint; and

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED that this Court enter an Order that the time within which Defendant shall respond to the Complaint is extended from January 31, 2020 to February 28, 2020.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 29, 2020 HUGHEY PHILLIPS, LLP /s/ Galen M. Gentry Kevin Hughey Noah Phillips Galen M. Gentry Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: January 29, 2020 HARRIS BRICKEN McVAY SLIWOSKI LLP /s/ Jihee Ahn Jihee Ahn Jesse Mondry Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which Defendant MOJAVE JANE BRANDS, INC., formerly known as High Hampton Holdings Corp., shall respond to the Complaint is extended from January 31, 2020 to February 28, 2020.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer