2-Way Computing, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, 2:15-cv-02230-GMN-(CWH). (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160429e09
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way") and Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Mobility II LLC (collectively, "ATTM") by and through their counsel, hereby file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Deadline to File Proposed Protective Order. This request complies with Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1. The litigation of this matter will b
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way") and Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Mobility II LLC (collectively, "ATTM") by and through their counsel, hereby file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Deadline to File Proposed Protective Order. This request complies with Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1. The litigation of this matter will be..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
(First Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way") and Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Mobility II LLC (collectively, "ATTM") by and through their counsel, hereby file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Deadline to File Proposed Protective Order. This request complies with Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1. The litigation of this matter will be best served by the proposed extension. This is the first request to extend this deadline. This request is not made after the deadline.
On April 26, 2016, the Court entered the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in this matter, ECF No. 44, setting April 27, 2016 as the deadline for the parties to file a proposed protective order. The parties agree that a two-week extension of the proposed protective order deadline, to May 11, 2016, will permit the parties time to resolve any initial disagreements regarding the language of the proposed protective order and work toward submitting an agreed proposed order to the Court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant this request to continue the deadline to file a proposed protective order. Respectfully submitted,
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
