Proofpoint, Inc. v. BTM Comercio De Equipamentos E Softwares De Informatica, 17-cv-06065-BLF. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180817991
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADR-RELATED DEADLINES BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Proofpoint, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") unopposed Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management and ADR-Related Deadlines. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b), the Court ORDERS that the deadlines to meet and confer and submit a stipulation for all remaining case management deadlines ( see ECF 74) and to file an updated ADR stipu
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADR-RELATED DEADLINES BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Proofpoint, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") unopposed Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management and ADR-Related Deadlines. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b), the Court ORDERS that the deadlines to meet and confer and submit a stipulation for all remaining case management deadlines ( see ECF 74) and to file an updated ADR stipul..
More
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADR-RELATED DEADLINES
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Proofpoint, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") unopposed Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management and ADR-Related Deadlines. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b), the Court ORDERS that the deadlines to meet and confer and submit a stipulation for all remaining case management deadlines (see ECF 74) and to file an updated ADR stipulation (see ECF 75) are hereby continued to August 31, 2018, without prejudice to an additional request for continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
