STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States of America, by its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Jason Hitt, and defendant Jorge SANDOVAL, by and through his counsel Tim Pori, Esq., stipulate and agree that the existing status conference date of December 1, 2014, should be vacated. The parties further stipulate and agree that a status conference and possible change of plea should be set for January 26, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

The parties believe a continuance of the status conference will save judicial resources by eliminating an unnecessary status conference because the parties have negotiated a global resolution of the defendant's exposure in this case and an unrelated criminal matter in San Francisco County Superior Court. The parties, however, need additional time to review the discovery from both cases, discuss the details of the District Attorney's offer, and finalize the terms of the proposed global resolution.

The parties further stipulate and agree that the ends of justice outweigh the interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial because the additional time will permit the defense to effectively evaluate the posture of the case and prepare compare the discovery provided in both state and federal jurisdictions to the proposed global resolution being offered. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that time should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4. In addition, the defendant concurs in the Court's earlier finding that this matter is "complex" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) (Local Code T2) because of the voluminous discovery, including three Title III wiretaps, the complexity and nature of the underlying conspiracy theory involving both gang and drug trafficking activities, and the intertwined related case involving many convicted defendants in United States v. Diaz, et al., Case No. 2:07-cr-0248 WBS. The parties therefore stipulate that time between December 1, 2014, and January 26, 2015, should be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act based upon the complexity of this case under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and Local Code T2.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based upon the representations and stipulation of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The status conference in this matter is set for December 1, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED;

3. Based upon the representations and stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the time exclusion under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) applies and the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded from December 1, 2014, up to and including January 26, 2015. The Court further finds that this case complex and unusual because of the voluminous discovery supporting the charges, the unique form of drug conspiracy in the case, and extensive trial transcripts from the related case involving many convicted defendants in United States v. Diaz, et al., Case No. 2:07-cr-0248 WBS. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through January 26, 2015, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and Local Code T2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.