TRAF Intercontinental Elektronik-Handels GmbH v. SonoCine, Inc., 3:17-cv-00672-LRH-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180824b06
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PETITIONER TO OPPOSE AND RESPONDENT TO REPLY REGARDING SONOCINE, INC.'S FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND ENTER JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELECKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH, by and through its counsel of record, Jonathan J. Whitehead of Whitehead & Whitehead, and Respondent SONOCINE, INC., by and through its counsel of record, Ellen Jean
Summary: ORDER REGARDING: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PETITIONER TO OPPOSE AND RESPONDENT TO REPLY REGARDING SONOCINE, INC.'S FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND ENTER JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELECKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH, by and through its counsel of record, Jonathan J. Whitehead of Whitehead & Whitehead, and Respondent SONOCINE, INC., by and through its counsel of record, Ellen Jean W..
More
ORDER REGARDING:
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PETITIONER TO OPPOSE AND RESPONDENT TO REPLY REGARDING SONOCINE, INC.'S FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD AND ENTER JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELECKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH, by and through its counsel of record, Jonathan J. Whitehead of Whitehead & Whitehead, and Respondent SONOCINE, INC., by and through its counsel of record, Ellen Jean Winograd of Woodburn and Wedge and Terrence O. Kelly, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELEKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH to oppose SONOCINE, INC.'s FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Amended Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment (ECF No. 28) from the current deadline of August 22, 2018 to Wednesday, August 29, 2018. Respondent shall thereafter have through and including September 13, 2018 in which to file its Reply in Support of the FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss.
This is the parties' first request and is due to Petitioner's counsel's calendar containing previously scheduled depositions, an arbitration and drafting motions in limine and oppositions thereto for an upcoming trial which was set for September 10, 2018. The requested extended reply deadline of September 13, 2018 is due to the Labor Day holiday weekend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
