Rodriguez v. Beard, 2:14-cv-1049 MCE KJN P. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160422b62
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On March 23, 2016, pursuant to the mailbox rule, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 16, 2016 denying his request for issuance of subpoenas. Plaintiff's objections are construed as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it doe
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On March 23, 2016, pursuant to the mailbox rule, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 16, 2016 denying his request for issuance of subpoenas. Plaintiff's objections are construed as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
On March 23, 2016, pursuant to the mailbox rule, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 16, 2016 denying his request for issuance of subpoenas. Plaintiff's objections are construed as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 16, 2016 is affirmed.
Source: Leagle
