Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Water Conservation Technology International, Inc. v. Roseburg Forest Products Co., 2:16-cv-02151-TLN-EFB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160930b49 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Defendant Roseburg Forest Products Co. ("Defendant"), and Plaintiff Water Conservation Technology International, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agrees as follows: WHEREAS, on September 9, 2016, Plaintiff filed the original Complaint in the above-captioned action in United States District Cou
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Defendant Roseburg Forest Products Co. ("Defendant"), and Plaintiff Water Conservation Technology International, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agrees as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2016, Plaintiff filed the original Complaint in the above-captioned action in United States District Court of California, Eastern District;

WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint, effective on September 14, 2016;

WHEREAS, on October 5, 2016, Defendant is otherwise required to file and serve their initial response to the Summons and Complaint in this matter;

WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested an extension of time to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties are negotiating a potential early resolution and are in the process of meeting and conferring; therefore, the parties have agreed to an additional 30-day extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's agreement to extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court order or involve papers required to be filed or lodged with the Court, other than an initial response to the Complaint;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree that Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to November 4, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to November 4, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer