Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sanchez v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00596-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190204813 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from January 30, 2018 to February 1, 2019. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel needs
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from January 30, 2018 to February 1, 2019. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel needs additional time due to migraine symptoms of Counsel on the date of the current filing deadline, which impair her vision. Counsel attempted to diligently finalize her response, but could not do so due to her vision impairment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED NUNC PRO TUNC TO 1-30-2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer