Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barrett v. Berry, 19-cv-01923-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191113920 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 32 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff has requested subpoenas for documents, and also inquired as to whether there are local rules governing service, subpoenas, and notifications in pro se cases. Dkt. No. 25. The Court cannot provide plaintiff with legal advice as to how to prosecute his case. Plaintiff should directly consult the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California's Local Rules
More

ORDER REGARDING ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 32

Plaintiff has requested subpoenas for documents, and also inquired as to whether there are local rules governing service, subpoenas, and notifications in pro se cases. Dkt. No. 25. The Court cannot provide plaintiff with legal advice as to how to prosecute his case. Plaintiff should directly consult the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California's Local Rules if he has questions regarding what these rules require. Plaintiff has been provided with three blank subpoena forms. Plaintiff now requests three blank subpoena forms signed by the Clerk. Dkt. No. 32. The Court does not provide blank subpoena forms signed by the Clerk. Plaintiff should complete the subpoena forms he currently has. After the subpoenas are completed, he should return them the Court for issuance by the Clerk, issuance meaning only that a deputy clerk will sign them and put the clerk's stamp on them. The subpoenas will thereafter be returned to plaintiff for service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer