Linville v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-02135-MCE-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190702817
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FILED BY DANIEL KELLEN LINVILLE, JR. KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereby stipulate and agree this date of July 1, 2019, subject to the Court's approval and order, to a second extension of time for plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment for an additional three weeks from June 28, 2019 to July 19, 2019 , with all other deadlines likewise extended. This is Plaintiff's second extension of time. There is good cause to ex
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FILED BY DANIEL KELLEN LINVILLE, JR. KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereby stipulate and agree this date of July 1, 2019, subject to the Court's approval and order, to a second extension of time for plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment for an additional three weeks from June 28, 2019 to July 19, 2019 , with all other deadlines likewise extended. This is Plaintiff's second extension of time. There is good cause to ext..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FILED BY DANIEL KELLEN LINVILLE, JR.
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties hereby stipulate and agree this date of July 1, 2019, subject to the Court's approval and order, to a second extension of time for plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment for an additional three weeks from June 28, 2019 to July 19, 2019, with all other deadlines likewise extended. This is Plaintiff's second extension of time.
There is good cause to extend time and modify the Scheduling Order, ECF No. 5, based on the representation by plaintiff's counsel that due to the size of the administrative record, ECF No. 13 (over 1,100 pages) and number of errors counsel believes exist and require discussion, the motion for summary judgment cannot be submitted without prejudice to plaintiff within the time estimate of the original extension despite diligence (over 80 hours has been devoted to this action between May 20 and June 27).
Plaintiff's counsel believes that revisions to the motion should not exceed an additional 10 hours of professional time, however, three weeks is required to account for potential delays and disruptions as plaintiff's counsel is relocating his office from Fairfax to San Rafael and scheduling conflicts.
WEEMS LAW OFFICES MCGREGOR W. SCOTT,
U.S. Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL,
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Soc. Sec. Admin.
S. WYETH McADAM,
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
/s/Robert C. Weems By: S. Wyeth McAdam
Robert C. Weems, S. WYETH McADAM,
Attorney for Plaintiff Sp. Assist. U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
