Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Crosby, 2:17-CR-00006-MCE. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190510866 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 08, 2019
Latest Update: May 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL MOTIONS AND TRIAL CONFIRMATION; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this Court set a schedule for pretrial motions pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)-(D), with the deadline for filing such motions set for on or before January 15, 2019. ECF Dkt. No. 60. 2. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties in light of discussions of possible resolution, the Court ordered that the deadline for filing su
More

STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL MOTIONS AND TRIAL CONFIRMATION; ORDER

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this Court set a schedule for pretrial motions pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)-(D), with the deadline for filing such motions set for on or before January 15, 2019. ECF Dkt. No. 60.

2. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties in light of discussions of possible resolution, the Court ordered that the deadline for filing such motions be extended first to February 15, 2019, then to March 18, 2019, and then to May 15, 2019. ECF Dkt. Nos. 68, 71, 73.

3. The parties are continuing to discuss the possibility of resolution and agree that it is in the best interests of all parties to continue the deadline for pretrial motions.

4. Accordingly, the parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court amend the previously set schedule for pretrial motions and adopt the following:

i) All pretrial motions brought pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)-(D) shall be filed on or before June 13, 2019;

ii) Any opposition by the non-moving party shall be filed on or before July 8, 2019;

iii) The moving party's optional reply shall be filed on or before July 18, 2019; and

iv) A hearing on the motions, if any, shall be held on August 1, 2019, or as soon thereafter as may be available to the Court.

5. Additionally, in light of the proposed briefing and hearing schedule for pretrial motions, the parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court continue the date of the trial confirmation hearing currently set for August 1, 2019 to August 15, 2019.

6. The trial date set for September 30, 2019 shall remain as previously scheduled. The parties presently estimate that the trial will take approximately 14 court days to conclude, excluding time for jury deliberation.

7. The Court has previously found that, for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of March 8, 2018 to September 30, 2019, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The parties confirm by this stipulation that such a finding should be reaffirmed, as the defendants still require until September 30, 2019 to prepare for trial.

8. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 7, 2019 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP By: /s/ Elliot R. Peters ELLIOT R. PETERS Attorneys for Defendant JOHN A. CROSBY Dated: May 7, 2019 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP By: /s/ Benedict Y. Hur BENEDICT Y. HUR Attorneys for Defendant INES S. CROSBY Dated: May 6, 2019 PHILLIP A. TALBERT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515 Matthew M. Yelovich as authorized on By: May 6, 2019 MATTHEW M. YELOVICH Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Dated: May 7, 2019. HEATHER WILLIAMS Federal Public Defender /s/ Matthew Bockmon, as authorized on By: May 7, 2019 MATTHEW BOCKMON JEROME PRICE Assistant Federal Defenders Attorneys for Defendant LESLIE LOHSE

ATTESTATIONS

The undersigned counsel of record for defendants John Crosby and Ines Crosby, jointly represented by the law firm Keker, Van Nest & Peters, LLP, hereby attest and affirm that they are not presently aware of any actual conflicts of interest regarding the joint representation of John Crosby and Ines Crosby.

IT IS SO ATTESTED.

Dated: May 7, 2019. KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP By: /s/ Elliot R. Peters ELLIOT R. PETERS Attorneys for Defendant JOHN A. CROSBY Dated: May 7, 2019. KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP By: /s/ Benedict Y. Hur BENEDICT Y. HUR Attorneys for Defendant INES S. CROSBY

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer