Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Heilman v. Cherniss, 2:11-cv-00042-JAM-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180313683 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with this Court's Order (Dkt. No. 218), Plaintiff Thomas Heilman ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Christopher Cherniss and Larry Lesane ("Defendants") have conferred regarding a schedule for expert discovery. While the parties are not certain that expert discovery will be required, the parties stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to the following schedule fo
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR EXPERT DISCOVERY

In accordance with this Court's Order (Dkt. No. 218), Plaintiff Thomas Heilman ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Christopher Cherniss and Larry Lesane ("Defendants") have conferred regarding a schedule for expert discovery. While the parties are not certain that expert discovery will be required, the parties stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to the following schedule for expert discovery:

(1) May 1, 2018 — Disclosure of Expert Witnesses (2) May 24, 2018 — Disclosure of Initial Expert Reports (3) June 14, 2018 — Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses and Rebuttal Expert Reports (4) June 29, 2018 — Close of Expert Discovery

The parties will notify the Court if they subsequently agree that no expert discovery will be needed.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION ABOVE, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer