Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jones v. Centerone Financial Services, LLC, 4:14-cv-01673 SI. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140813925 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Pursuant to the following stipulation, the parties have agreed to, and request that the Court grant, a continuance of the September 5, 2014 Initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this action to December 12, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., and that all related deadlines be continued accordingly. STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, defendant
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Pursuant to the following stipulation, the parties have agreed to, and request that the Court grant, a continuance of the September 5, 2014 Initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this action to December 12, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., and that all related deadlines be continued accordingly.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, defendant CenterOne Financial Services, LLC ("CenterOne") and plaintiff Mark R. Jones ("Jones") stipulate and request as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 26, 2014, the Court entered the parties' Stipulation and Order Continuing Case Management and Related Deadlines, which continued the CMC until five weeks after the hearing on CenterOne's initial Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 23);

WHEREAS, on July 31, 2014, the Court issued its Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint With Leave to Amend (Docket No. 25), in which it set a deadline of August 15, 2014 for Jones to file his amended complaint;

WHEREAS, it is anticipated that a further motion to dismiss will be filed as to the claims in plaintiff's amended complaint, which motion would be due no later than August 29, 2014 for hearing on November 7, 2014, pursuant to the Court's currently available dates in Fall 2014;

WHEREAS, the current CMC date of September 5, 2014 would require the parties to begin the Rule 26 meet-and-confer process shortly and file a joint case management statement by August 29, 2014;

WHEREAS, the case schedule originally contemplated a five week period between defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the initial CMC;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties have conferred and agree that continuing the CMC and related deadlines until after this Court has ruled on on CenterOne's renewed Motion to Dismiss would be in the parties' best interests and in the interest of judicial economy;

WHEREAS, with respect to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the previous time modifications in this action include: a) the re-setting of the Initial CMC by the Clerk from July 30, 2014 to August 1, 2014 (Docket Nos. 4 and 11); b) the Clerk's Notice of May 14, 2014 continuing the hearing for CenterOne's Motion to Dismiss to June 27, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. (Docket No. 16); c) the Clerk's Notice of June 18, 2014 continuing the hearing on CenterOne's Motion to Dimiss to August 1, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. (Docket No. 21), and d) the Court's Stipulation and Order Continuing Case Management and Related Deadlines, continuing the initial CMC to September 5, 2014 (Docket No. 23);

WHEREAS, with respect to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(3), a continuance of the initial CMC and related deadlines until five weeks after the anticipated November 7, 2014 hearing on defendant's renewed motion to dismiss will not, at this early stage, have a significant effect on the overall schedule for this case, and merely re-establishes the timing that existed when defendant's motion to dismiss was set for June 27, 2014 and the initial CMC was set for August 1, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED that the Court continue the current September 5, 2014 Initial CMC to December 12, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. and continue all related deadlines accordingly.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer