Mack v. Amazon.com Inc., 2:17-cv-01438-JLR. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20171030700
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Plaintiff Iain Mack ("Plaintiff") 1 and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend Defendants' deadline to answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until November 3, 2017 or such date as may be ordered by the Court pursuant to the parties' [contemplated/contemporaneously file
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Plaintiff Iain Mack ("Plaintiff") 1 and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend Defendants' deadline to answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until November 3, 2017 or such date as may be ordered by the Court pursuant to the parties' [contemplated/contemporaneously filed..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Plaintiff Iain Mack ("Plaintiff")1 and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend Defendants' deadline to answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until November 3, 2017 or such date as may be ordered by the Court pursuant to the parties' [contemplated/contemporaneously filed] Stipulation to Consolidate Cases, which [will be/is being] filed in Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., No. 2:16-cv-01554-JCC (Oct. 4, 2016, W.D. Wash.) (Coughenour, J.). Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 42(b), the parties have met and conferred regarding the consolidation of this matter with Rittmann and [intend to file/are filing] in Rittmann a Stipulation to Consolidate addressing, inter alia, "any scheduling issues implicated by consolidation such as which case schedule should govern in the consolidated action," see LCR 42(b), including the stay in the Rittmann case and the deadline to answer the Mack complaint.
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, Defendants' deadline to answer the Amended Complaint is the later of November 3, 2017 or such date as may be ordered by the Court pursuant to Stipulation to Consolidate.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff Raef Lawson voluntarily dismissed his claim in this matter, but is a named plaintiff in the pending Rittmann matter referenced herein.
Source: Leagle
