Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GOLD v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., 14-cv-05373-TEH. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170224e78 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . On February 17, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion to file under seal excerpts of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and numerous exhibits to the Declaration of Jeffrey B. Cereghino in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification. ECF No. 108. Plaintiffs filed the motion to seal under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) because the parties are subject to a stipulated protective order in this case and Defendan
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

On February 17, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion to file under seal excerpts of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and numerous exhibits to the Declaration of Jeffrey B. Cereghino in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification. ECF No. 108. Plaintiffs filed the motion to seal under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) because the parties are subject to a stipulated protective order in this case and Defendant designated certain documents as "confidential." Id. at 2:7-21.

Under these circumstances, Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) requires Defendant to file a declaration "establishing that all of the designated material is sealable." Defendant has not filed any such declaration, and the time to do so has now passed. Accordingly, the motion to file under seal is DENIED. Plaintiffs "may file the [unredacted] document in the public record no earlier than 4 days, and no later than 10 days," after the date of this order. Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer