Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

S & P FINANCIAL ADVISORS v. KREEYAA LLC, 16-cv-03103-SK. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160802b77 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' CONSENT Regarding Docket No. 18 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . On July 15, 2016, a form indicating consent to have this matter heard by a magistrate judge was filed on behalf of Mansoor Rahmani, one of the two plaintiffs in this case. ( See Dkt. 18.) However, there are several problems with the form that was filed. First, the consent form does not include the case caption. Second, it was signed by an attorney who has not submitted a pro hac vice application.
More

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' CONSENT

Regarding Docket No. 18

On July 15, 2016, a form indicating consent to have this matter heard by a magistrate judge was filed on behalf of Mansoor Rahmani, one of the two plaintiffs in this case. (See Dkt. 18.) However, there are several problems with the form that was filed. First, the consent form does not include the case caption. Second, it was signed by an attorney who has not submitted a pro hac vice application. Third, there is no indication as to whether the other plaintiff in this matter, S & P Financial Advisors, consents to have this matter heard by a magistrate judge. Unless and until all parties file a valid consent form by counsel of record, the undersigned may not make any dispostive rulings in this matter. Plaintiffs are HEREBY DIRECTED to document their consent or request reassignment by no later than August 4, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer