Watkins v. Atkins, 5:19-cv-180-DPM-BD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191218a04
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's partial recommendation, N o 32, and overrules Watkins's objections, N o 37. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Watkins exhausted Grievance PB-18-149; but that grievance didn't mention Warden Lay and thus didn't exhaust any claims against him. N o 32 at 3 & N o 37 at 4. The motion for partial summary judgment, N o 27, is therefore granted. Watkins's claims agains
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's partial recommendation, N o 32, and overrules Watkins's objections, N o 37. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Watkins exhausted Grievance PB-18-149; but that grievance didn't mention Warden Lay and thus didn't exhaust any claims against him. N o 32 at 3 & N o 37 at 4. The motion for partial summary judgment, N o 27, is therefore granted. Watkins's claims against..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's partial recommendation, No 32, and overrules Watkins's objections, No 37. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Watkins exhausted Grievance PB-18-149; but that grievance didn't mention Warden Lay and thus didn't exhaust any claims against him. No 32 at 3 & No 37 at 4. The motion for partial summary judgment, No 27, is therefore granted. Watkins's claims against Lay are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
