FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. JOHNSON, : 2:10-cv-002203-RLH-GWF. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120127k87
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply-#425. ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is the Federal Trade Commission's Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply (#452, filed Jan. 25, 2012), in which the FTC seeks leave to file a sur-reply to Defendant Jeremy Johnson's opposition to the intervention and stay motions (##438, 439). The Court denies the motion because it was filed on the eve of the hearing in which the intervention and stay motions would be argued, and is therefore untimely, a
Summary: ORDER Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply-#425. ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Before the Court is the Federal Trade Commission's Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply (#452, filed Jan. 25, 2012), in which the FTC seeks leave to file a sur-reply to Defendant Jeremy Johnson's opposition to the intervention and stay motions (##438, 439). The Court denies the motion because it was filed on the eve of the hearing in which the intervention and stay motions would be argued, and is therefore untimely, an..
More
ORDER
Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply-#425.
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Federal Trade Commission's Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply (#452, filed Jan. 25, 2012), in which the FTC seeks leave to file a sur-reply to Defendant Jeremy Johnson's opposition to the intervention and stay motions (##438, 439). The Court denies the motion because it was filed on the eve of the hearing in which the intervention and stay motions would be argued, and is therefore untimely, and because the attached sur-reply raises issues that are tangential to the disposition of those motions.
Accordingly, and for good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the FTC's Motion to File Attached Sur-Reply (#452) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
