Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC, 4-14-cv-04968-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180629d58 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE The HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Security People, Inc. ("Digilock") and Defendant Ojmar US, LLC ("Ojmar") (together, "the Parties") hereby jointly stipulate to a dismissal of this action: WHEREAS, Digilock filed this patent infringement action against Ojmar on November 10, 2014; WHEREAS, Ojmar answered and counterclaimed in this action on Mar
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE The

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Security People, Inc. ("Digilock") and Defendant Ojmar US, LLC ("Ojmar") (together, "the Parties") hereby jointly stipulate to a dismissal of this action:

WHEREAS, Digilock filed this patent infringement action against Ojmar on November 10, 2014;

WHEREAS, Ojmar answered and counterclaimed in this action on March 4, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Parties have now entered into a settlement agreement, with an effective date of June 26, 2018, that resolves this case and all other civil cases between the parties; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to that settlement agreement, the Parties have agreed that all of the claims and counterclaims of this case should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs.

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California shall retain jurisdiction of any action to enforce and/or interpret the terms of the settlement agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, jointly stipulate to a dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counterclaims in this case. The Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs for all proceedings in this case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and (Proposed) Order.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION IS HHEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims, counterclaims, and Parties, with each Party bearing its own attorney's fees and costs. The U.S. District Court ffor the Northern District of California shall retain jurisdiction to enforce and/or interpret the terms of the settlement agreement. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer