Tyurina v. Urbana Tahoe TC LLC, 2:16-cv-00759-TLN-EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171005e73
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from October 26, 2017 to December 11, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter. Despite their diligence, the parties are still in the midst of completing fact discovery. The parties accordingly wish to postpone ex
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from October 26, 2017 to December 11, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter. Despite their diligence, the parties are still in the midst of completing fact discovery. The parties accordingly wish to postpone exp..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from October 26, 2017 to December 11, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter.
Despite their diligence, the parties are still in the midst of completing fact discovery. The parties accordingly wish to postpone expert disclosures to allow time to process evidence expected from fact discovery before confirming their selection of experts and submitting their expert reports.
Trial in this matter is set for July 16, 2018, and thus an amended expert disclosure deadline would still comport with the requirement that expert disclosures be made 90 days before trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D). The parties do not request any change or extension of any other previously established dates in the Court's Scheduling Order of August 29, 2016.
SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
